The Long Game Of Power

A Response To J.D. Vance's Turning Point Statement

At a December 21. 2025, "Turning Point USA" event in Phoenix Arizona, called "Americafest 2025", J.D. Vance declared the statement; " In the United States of America, you don't have to apologize for being white anymore". That racially coded political statement is more of a "Poker Tell" than a well meaning one. How can we say it is "American" in nature when we know that American values are race-neutral under law? You see, there is no legal, cultural, or institutional force in the U.S. that requires white Americans to "apologize" for being white.

Listen to the Audio Version

The Long Game Of Power mp3The Justice Journal Blog

5:24

Or continue reading:

According to the Supreme Court of the United States this statement alone does not meet the Legal Threshold of what can be considered racist or discriminatory because: "Speech Alone" is not enough, and a few other word salad reasons. But, here is what we do know! This statement is, racially grievance-based and bigoted in it's implications. It tries to frame white identity as a victim class needing help. This premise itself implicitly dismisses real documented racially inequities experienced by people of color in this country.

This reactionary and divisive statement also responds to a "cultural loss" perceived by white America, that never actually happened. And even more telling, does not possess any actual policy or legal conditions to exist. Crazy right?, It is also a dog-whistle signal of alignment for those white audiences who interpret equality efforts in this county as an "attack on whiteness". This is "The Justice Journal Blog's" quote on this statement by J.D. Vance. "This statement is a reactionary racial grievance statement designed to normalize white identity politics while denying the structural realities that made race a political issue in the first place".

You see, when someone says that they no longer need to apologize, they are doing is:

• Inventing an oppressor

• Casting themselves as the party that has been affected

• Celebrating liberation from a burden that never materially existed.

But do these creations seem hollow in this situation? This perceived victory does not follow any struggle. It does not stem from any provable sacrifice, or even a resolution. This entire concept seems to stem from an anxiety that exist across the white community as a whole. It obviously does not end any type of conflict that exist, and seems to be more of a performance toward dominance which is meant to quiet a fear that this group of people has in regards to losing status in this country and maybe around the entire world.

This is relief masquerading as conquest which does not make sense to anyone except for those who are a part of this messaging. Other implications that maybe intended by this messaging could be:

• Assurance to a base of people that they were in a fight all along, and won.

• An intimidation tactic aimed at any opposition to white dominance

• A discipline of uncertainty toward hagiarchy preservation

• A covering of the truth of the white dominance agenda itself

The topper on all of this is that the law does not agree that this type of rhetoric mandates differential treatment across the races, but reality says something totally different than the wording of the law. It re-centers white identity as a "protected status" in America. The rhetoric also withdraws moral accountability from one racial group while others remain racialized. It reframes grievance, signaling that complaints from white Americans is legitimate, while all others are still excessive, divisive, or illegitimate.

Regardless of how the laws on discriminations read, this is a continuation of differential treatment, full stop. Most of us already know that these types of statements translate into the justifications for unfair policies. The selective enforcement of these policies by law enforcement, businesses, and employment entities, and more. All the law on this does is make it harder for anyone other that white people to prove a wrong has happened. The law allows for the normalization of this type of stance by certain groups, and creates a path for racism in this country as a process.

Especially in the United States when statements like this one are made, actions happen in every aspect of our society. An example of this is when DEI was attacked verbally by the Trump Administration businesses around the country used that rhetoric to roll back initiatives that were designed to address the disparities that people of color have always faced. This disparity did not start or stop with rhetoric, and can be traced by as far as the Reconstruction Era through the Civil Rights Era, and obviously continues to be how America maintains the hierarchy of power possessed by the white people who still maintain it.